We run a continuous indexer against Robinhood Chain (chain ID 4663) that watches the Uniswap V3 factory
(0x1f7d7550…2EfA)
for PoolCreated events.
Every new memecoin on Robinhood Chain creates a Uniswap V3 pool at launch, so this captures
every launch, regardless of which launchpad produced it.
For each launch we record: the token address, name/symbol, the pool address, the creation block and timestamp, the creator (the externally-owned account that sent the launch transaction), and the launchpad (the contract that transaction called). We store nothing that isn’t already public on-chain.
We verified the launch mechanics directly from the deployed launchpad contracts rather than assuming. Robinhood Chain memecoins launch as instant Uniswap V3 pools with locked liquidity — not bonding curves with a graduation step. The three dominant launch paths are:
PonsLaunchFactory) — the largest by volume.LaunchHoodV3Factory, launchhood.fun) — deploys token clones and locks LP.Because pools are created immediately, most launch with single-sided liquidity (the token, paired against ~0 WETH); WETH only accumulates in the pool as people buy. This detail is the foundation of our liquidity signal below.
We measure whether a token holds real liquidity by reading its pool’s WETH balance on-chain. A token is classified “dead / no liquidity” when, after it is at least 48 hours old, its pool holds less than 0.01 WETH.
We calibrated the 0.01 WETH threshold empirically: sampling recent pools, ~92% hold under 0.01 WETH, with a clean gap between “dust” (near zero) and genuinely funded pools (0.5 WETH and up). The threshold is configurable and published.
We group every token by its creator wallet and assign a reputation tier:
“Matured” means older than 48h and liquidity-checked; tokens too young to judge are never counted as dead. High launch volume is itself weighted as a risk indicator, since serial mass-launching correlates strongly with low survival.
Because we capture which contract initiated each launch, we can compare launchpads head-to-head — launch volume, average risk, and death rate per launchpad. To our knowledge this is the only per-launchpad rug-rate comparison on Robinhood Chain. It lets a user ask “does Pons or LaunchHood produce more failed tokens?” and get an on-chain answer.
A single 0–100 number: the average per-token risk score of all tokens launched in the last 24 hours. It’s a daily “fear gauge” for the chain, not a per-token judgment.
Each token gets a 0–100 risk score (higher = riskier), a weighted blend of on-chain signals:
On-chain analysis cannot see off-chain intent, private agreements, or future behavior. Scores are probabilistic risk indicators derived from public data, updated continuously, and not financial advice or a guarantee of safety. Always do your own research.
| Version | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| v1.0 | 2026-07-18 | Initial public methodology. Liquidity death-signal calibrated to 0.01 WETH; creator reputation tiers; launchpad attribution (Pons, LaunchHood, Direct); Doom Index; v1 composite risk score. |
| v2 | Planned | Real LP-lock detection, honeypot/sell-tax simulation, and creator-funding clustering folded into the composite score; wallet-exposure (fund-flow) tracing. |